|
|
| relmaro The significance of the inscription is not clear. Poros. Fragment. The top and bottom edges are preserved; both ends and the back are broken off. The bottom edge has traces of a raised moulding ... Letters probably date from early 5th.c. B.C ... I |
| rtino The significance of the inscription is not clear. Poros. Fragment. The left end of the block is missing, but portions of the top, bottom, and right sides are preserved, as well as part of the ... Letters probably date from early 5th.c. B.C ... I |
| Inscribed boundary stone.
Mended from five fragments.
Broken at left side and bottom only; but the left side may represent original state of the stone, and a bit of bottom seems to be preserved.
Below ... Ca. 400 B.C ... I 2408 ... I 2408 |
| Inscribed fragments.
Fragment ΘΘ 105 a), inscribed face only preserved.
Six lines of the inscription preserved; boustrophedon.
Fragment ΘΘ 105 b), inscribed face only preserved.
Seven to eight lines ... a-c) (ΘΘ 105 a-c) 16, 16, 17 April 1937
d) (ΘΘ 138) 20 april 1937
e) (ΘΘ 155) 23 April 1937
f) (ΘΘ 206) 12 May 1937
g) (ΑΑ 64) 9 February 1938
h) (ΙΙ 223) 26 February 1938
i) (ΑΑ 244) 6 April 1938
j) (ΙΙ ...
Fragment ΑΑ 244 i), inscribed ... 272 m), inscribed face, top ... Belongs to IG I2, no. 839.
With |
|
|
