|
| Inscribed fragments.
Two fragments, which join, preserve the width and thickness of the stele; broken at top and bottom.
Tapering lightly toward the top. Sides smooth picked; back rough.
The upper part ... 155/4 B.C ... Tracy (1990), pp. 79, 99, 100, 102, 136, 142, 163-165, 206, 227-228, 230, |
Mended with missing pieces restored in plaster and painted, notably sections of the lower part of the body. Glaze abraded around handle B/A. H. 0.563; rest. diam. 0.415. T. L. Shear, Hesperia 7, 1938, ... Ca. 440-430 B.C ... 1986, pl. 40; JdI 102, 1987, |
| Inscribed fragments.
Face dressed with tooth chisel.
Fragment Ψ 8 a), top preserved; otherwise broken.
Twelve lines of the inscription preserved.
Fragments Ψ 12 b and c), insribed face only preserved ... a) (Ψ 8) 15 November 1937
b-c) (Ψ 12b and Ψ 12c) 16 November 1937
d) (Ψ 28) 18 November 1937
e) (Ψ 33) 24 November 1937
f) (Ψ 49) 25 November 1937
g) (Ψ 55) 30 November 1937
h) (Ψ 61) 30 November 1937 ... c) 0.238, d) 0.172, e) ... 0.315, b) 0.080, c) 0.208, d) ... 0.137, h) 0.441, i) 0.102, j) |
| Angle fragment.
Clay rather pale.
Chipping at edge of inner break of fragment has removed a little of the circumference of the impression, which is otherwise quite fresh. Most of the area is occupied ... 5 March 1933 ... century B.C. or earlier ... the beginning of 3c BC,
or |
| Inscribed fragment of stele.
The top akroterion and some of the bottom below the setting line broken away; otherwise intact.
An attempt was made in antiquity to break up the stele, and a narrow channel ... 337/336 B.C ... 337/336 B.C. |
| A small fragment from the side and a chip from the rim are missing. The bowl has an offset rim, flat, with two mouldings below: one wide, one narrow. Between two raised ridges under the main zone is a ... 13 May 1933 ... Lot Ζ 102 |
|
|